1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

A person who is not a marina society shall not commit an act of paying goods or benefits on property to the enemy by having him/her engage in an act similar to the horse riding voting in relation to a racing conducted by a marina society. However, the defendant, in collusion with his/her name-oriented winner, committed an act of paying goods or benefits on November 15, 2013 in collusion with the victim of the horse Association, which is 204 of Pyeongtaek-si C building around 16:0 and the Internet private horse racing site (D) operated by the winner of the computer, and installed a program for hosting the racing conducted by the Korean Racing Association, which is granted a ID and password, and then received the money from the customer F, etc. and followed the horse riding voting on the above site as much as the amount of the horse riding paid to the customer, and if he/she did not participate in the horse riding, the defendant paid the money to the customer in accordance with the dividend rate of the Korean Racing Association; if he/she did not pay the money to the customer, he/she did not pay the money to the beneficiary of the horse racing through a similar act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on seizure, list of seizure, lease contract, receipt, investigation report (Attachment to a photograph of closure on a private horse site);

1. Article 50 of the relevant Act and Articles 50 subparagraph 1 and 48 (2) 1 of the Korean Racing Association Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act is that there is no room for prior action in that he/she committed the instant crime even though he/she was placed under a stay of execution twice due to gambling or other similar speculative acts. However, he/she led to the confession of the crime.