logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.02.11 2019고단1542
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the defendant of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip motor vehicle;

At around 12:50 on October 27, 2019, the Defendant continued the front road D in the Gumi-si C from the front section to the front section of the Gumi-si.

At the time, the signal of the front intersection was in the state of red lights, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system after checking the safety of the front, rear, left and well, and then checking the safety of the front, rear, and left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the back panion of the F HK car driven by the victim E (the age of 32) who is in front of the front line due to negligence and failed to properly conduct the front line, and caused the said horse car to be pushed back panion of the F K7 car driven by the said passenger vehicle in front of the front line.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, and inflicted injury on the victim I (the 31 years old), who is a passenger of the said horse set, on the part of the victim I (the 31 years old), on the part of the victim I (the 31 years old), on the part of the victim, on the part of the victim E, on the part of KRW 5,272,474 on the repair cost of the said horse set.

2. No motor vehicle owner who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on which mandatory insurance is not subscribed;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated Bchip car without mandatory insurance in approximately 10 km section, which is located in Gumi-si, Gumi-si, Gumi-si, J, and up to D's front road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, each accident site photograph, mandatory insurance bureau, a statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and each medical certificate;

arrow