A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 604"

1. On September 9, 2015, the Defendant, around 08:00 on September 9, 2015, opened a steering room for C Freight Vehicle that the victim B parked on the roads located in the Chungcheongnam-dong Eup, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and cut off with a cash of 1.3 million won in his/her own possession.

2. On October 13, 2015, around 08:10 on October 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a freight driver’s seat in C, which the victim B parked without any corrective device, prior to the 283-7 extreme Manionon road in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) opened a freight driver’s seat in C, which the victim B parked without any corrective device; and (c) placed it in cash in the same D, which was put into the same D, and stolen.

around 11:16 on December 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a rocketing vehicle owned by the victim D, which was not corrected at the parking lot of the 36 branch Eup/Myeon office, at the expense of the Chungcheongnam-do Office, and took cash of KRW 1,233,000, and stolen the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and D;

1. B written statements;

1. Investigation report (specific suspect);

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Submission of a written agreement and investigation of damage amount);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is that the defendant was subject to juvenile protective disposition more than once for the same crime, and the defendant again commits the crime in this case despite having been punished more than once by a fine, so it is necessary to punish the defendant strictly.

However, the fact that the defendant reflects the mistake in depth and does not repeat the crime, that both the victims and the victims have agreed smoothly, that the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or higher, and that the defendant has other reasons.