logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.09 2015나26600
장비임대료등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each of the statements stated in Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1-1 to 17, Gap evidence 3-5, Gap evidence 6-1 to 11, Gap evidence 7-1, 2, and Gap evidence 8 can be acknowledged after compiling the whole purport of the pleadings.

1) The Plaintiff’s construction site at the Defendant’s construction site (a lease list) at each time the Defendant’s request is made between July 6, 2014 and August 29, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

6. 0. 0: 40. 00 G 1. 6. 40: 00 G 1. 6. 40: 00 G 1. 03: 40,00 E on July 10, 2014; 40. 0. 6. 0. 06. 0. 40: 0. 06. 6. 0. 40, 00 on July 17, 2014; 40. 0. 0. 50: 0. 06. 40. 50, 000 on July 17, 2014; 40. 0. 50: 06. 00 on July 19, 2014; 10. 8. 40. 7. 5, 2005

3. On the other hand, the recommended mining reduction rent in the Gyeonggi-do Incheon Metropolitan City shall be as specified in the attached Table.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total sum of the rent for construction machinery from July 2014 to August 2014 and the delay damages therefrom, barring any other special circumstances.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. In relation to the lease of each of the construction machinery listed in Nos. 2, 3, 5, 10, 12, and 13 of the instant lease list, the Defendant, first of all, does not have a work confirmation on the pertinent date, or on the corresponding date.

arrow