A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s insult, around February 9, 2018, includes “A person drinking alcohol” from C before the Hanam-si around February 21:30, 2018.

“The victim F of the Victim F, a police box affiliated with the police box of the Southern Police Station Emba, dispatched to the scene after receiving a report 112, and the victim G, who was required to present his identification card from the police box affiliated with the above police box, during the surveillance of the above D, the police officer “All police officers shall boom the victims.”

Shebaba wals, such as glusa, abandoned his duties, which will be discarded well.

The victims were openly insulting by referring to a large interest.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties shall stop the front of the patrol vehicle of the police officers who want to be called to the place of report upon receiving a new report from around 22:50 on February 9, 2018 to 23:00, and from around 112 on receipt of a new report, and stop the front of the patrol vehicle.

Rests are abandonment of their duties.

It will well thrown away scars.

”, “ 씨 발 내가 뭘 잘못했냐!

The term “intimidating” means “intimidating” the arms of the said F, and booming the arms of G to cover them, and booming the chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The chief of a complaint, the 112 report processing slip, and the site photograph of the fact of damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to attach patrol booms and video images), investigation report (report on confirmation of black booms and video images);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall interfere with the execution of official duties (the act of interfering with the execution of official duties); and