Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for one year, and for four months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for embezzlement at the Changwon District Court on April 30, 2015 and two years for a suspended sentence of two years for embezzlement

5.8. The above judgment was finalized on June 10, 2016. Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months to imprisonment for fraud at the Changwon District Court on May 22, 2017. The above judgment was finalized on May 22, 2017. On April 6, 2017, Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment for three months at the Changwon District Court for fraud.

5. 1. The above judgment became final and conclusive, and on June 15, 2017, the Changwon District Court sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years to ten months of imprisonment for breach of trust, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 8 of the same year, and on March 28, 2018, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Jinwon District Court's Jinju Branch Branch for two months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud.

4. 5. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[2] Defendant A is a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the shipbuilding machinery of "G" in the Kimhae-si with the trade name of "E" and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the shipbuilding machinery of "G" in "G" in "H," and Defendant C is a person who is engaged in the business of selling the factory machinery in the trade name of "H."

On November 2013, the Defendants: (a) purchased three joint-use machines from the victim I Co., Ltd. under the name of B in the name of B; and (b) requested B to lend them to B; (c) and (d) decided that if the victim Co., Ltd. remitted the purchase price to C, it would be appropriated for the purchase price of machinery, instead of using it for the purchase price and the purchase price of lu

Accordingly, on the premise that the aforementioned G business establishment located in the J of Kimhae-si around November 29, 2013 was installed in the victim company’s employee in charge of the G, each of which is brought into the G business establishment, the Defendants are premised on the fact that each of the public machinery is brought into the G business establishment. The amount equivalent to KRW 1,07,00,000 in the purchase price of the CNC TNL-80V2) 1, which is supplied by Defendant C, and the amount equivalent to KRW 40,00,000 in the purchase price of the M-V70,000 in the M-V M-C (PUMA 10,000) purchase price of KRW 28,00,000 in total, KRW 175,00,000 in total, KRW 170,000.