logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.08.14 2017고단4957
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for embezzlement at the Daegu District Court on June 2, 2012, and became final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month. On August 10, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a six-month imprisonment for embezzlement at the same court and became final and conclusive on November 17, 2017.

Defendant

B On July 26, 2013, the Daegu District Court has been sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the same year.

8.3. As fixed and conclusive on February 26, 2014, the enforcement of the sentence was terminated in Daegu Prison.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant, while operating the 2017 Highestest 4957- Defendant A, knew of the fact that the Victim D had to dispose of the printed machine, etc. in the (ju) E-factory operated by the Victim D, he had the mind that he would pay the machinery cost to the Victim.

On October 20, 2008, the victim will purchase machinery such as 's shooting machine' to the victim in the Daegu-gu west-gu F.

The price of machinery is "to make a transfer of goods immediately after the delivery of the goods," and it has been provided with 60 million won at the market price of the defendant's operation, such as 1, 1 forking machine, 1 forking machine, 1 for line, 3 for rupture, 1 for rupture, 1 for rupture, 1 for cargo, 2 for rupture, 2 for rupture, 67 million won for rupture, rupture, rupture 2 for rupture, and rupture rupture and accessory machinery.

However, since the economic situation at the time is not good, the Defendant was in the state of the company operated by himself, and thus, disposed of the withdrawal machines, etc. purchased from the injured party and had the idea to cover the operating expenses of the company, and there was no intent or ability to pay the said machinery to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, purchased an amount equivalent to 67 million won, such as withdrawn machines, and did not pay the price, thereby defrauding the above machinery, etc.

2. The Defendants, 2018 Go-dan 2028- Defendants, who run a business in the G in the Gyeong-gun of Seongbuk-gu.

arrow