logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.12 2017고단3090
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the direction of an employee of the “Singishing”, was responsible for the role of “collection measures,” which received money from the victims of fraud, and conspired with the victims by deceiving the victims by presenting an official question under the name of “the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission” along with the name of the person who was not killed in the name of the victim, “D,” etc. in order to commit the phishing fraud.

The crime of phishing fraud is committed by misrepresenting the prosecutor, the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc. at the call center so that the victims may deliver money to the “collection book” and sharing the respective roles by sending money received from the victims to the “total liability” through the “collection book.”

1. On November 2, 2017, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Sinpoon E, using “Kakakao Stockholm,” sent a “civil petition for tracking a financial crime account” from “D”, which is the constituent element of Bosphishing organization, and dumped by the Defendant “dumping a customer’s check.”

The documents were delivered and sealed, and received an instruction to “on the face of cash-to-face delivery”.

On November 3, 2017, 10:00, the employees called “D,” etc. to the victim F, and called “G public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office,” and the H daily amount was used for the crime of creating a passbook in the name of the party.

Although a seizure officer may be conducted, it is false to deliver money to the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service who was given an opportunity to be exempted from the charge. However, the defendant et al. did not have a prosecutor belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office or an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service, and it was thought that the defendant et al. was used to receive money from the victims for the singing organization.

이에 따라 피고인은 2017. 11. 3. 14:10 경 ‘ 위 챗’ 을 통해 ‘D’ 등으로부터 “ 서울 영등포구 대림로 248 서울 중앙 교회 앞으로 가라” 는 지시를 받고 위 서울 중앙 교회 정문...

arrow