Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Defendant
A and B shall be subject to the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant C was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment on February 17, 2009 for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in the Seocho District Court’s territorial branch on November 9, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 13, 2012. On December 13, 2012, Defendant C was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for larceny, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2013.
On January 31, 2012, the Defendant was charged with the criminal facts, etc. that “A police officer 09:30 on September 31, 201, 201, from the kacker, who owns the victim A, deducted 12 liters of light oil from the kacker’s straw, and stolen it, and on October 21, 201, at around 20:20 on October 21, 201, the Defendant cut off 15 liters of light oil from the kacker truck, which is the victim B, by reducing the amount of 15 liters of light oil from the above method,” and was tried as the above court’s order 2012Kadan28,268 (combined).
In the above facts, the above Defendant, like the criminal facts in the above case No. 2012 Go-Ma28 of the above court, did not obtain prior permission from the above A, B, etc., and even if there were any facts, at the time of the above crime, there was a fear that the sentence is heavy during the repeated crime period, and thus, he was willing to request the above A, etc. to give false testimony for the purpose of receiving a verdict of innocence.
On June 5, 2012, the above Defendant requested Defendant B to the effect that “I would be allowed to get the oil deducted from the truck in advance to the court,” and requested Defendant B, who appeared as a witness at the entrance of the Seocho-gu Criminal Law for the aforementioned purport, to the effect that I would like to request Defendant B to make a false testimony, and Defendant B would have the false testimony. The above evidence was presented as described in paragraph (2).
Defendant C continues to be on September 2012, 201, at the site of the repair of the related objects in the Jamburg in the Jamba located in the Jambane, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do.