logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.19 2017누49784
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

3. The 7th page of the first instance judgment’s “Evidence” is added to “(including documentary evidence submitted by the Plaintiff at the trial).”

6 under the 3rd bottom of the first instance judgment, the following shall be added:

The Plaintiff accepted same-sexs as guests because the financial situation of the hotel he/she operated is not good, and thereby, was threatened by the chain and conflict in the village opposing them (No. 3).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow