1. On December 17, 2014, the Defendant applied for the revocation of the revocation of the revocation of the face value between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant on December 17, 2014.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a legal entity that operates the East Asian Broadcasting and Arts University (hereinafter referred to as the “university of this case”), and the Plaintiff was working as a professor at the university of this case from March 1, 199 to March 1, 199.

B. On August 26, 2014, the Intervenor demanded a resolution on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. On September 16, 2014, the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee of the East Asian Art University decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on the grounds as delineated below.

Accordingly, the intervenor dismissed the plaintiff on September 16, 2014.

1. Omission of lectures (or progress of lessons in D in a way different from the details of lectures in a lecture plan for subjects B or C opened in two semesters, 2012);

2. Voluntary destruction of the draft of the examination and the draft of the examination (the compulsory major subject of a semester from February 2, 2009 to February 2, 2013, the base materials for the sexual rating by subject of major selection, and the base materials for the sexual rating of subjects opened in 208 shall be reversed;

3. The examination and operation of student enrollment (the results shall be given without treating them as F credits even if he/she has been absent from school for at least 1/4 of the total number of business hours of E, F, and G taking courses for two semesters, 2012);

4. An inappropriate evaluation of the student's attendance score (or an inappropriate evaluation of the attendance score in the first semester H (J, K, L, M) of 2012, I (N,O, P), C (A) of 2012, Q (A) of 2012, and B (R) of the relevant student, despite that the number of days of absence is available for attendance, the attendance score shall be deemed the full score);

5. Violation of fairness in granting of sexual scores (public notice of the matters to be assigned additional points only to specific students on the part of H and I established in the first semester, and I established in the first semester, 2013, and granting additional points only to specific students);

6. Violation of fairness due to voluntary sexual evaluation (assessment of other points at will, such as granting a high level of other points to students who have failed to submit softs, practical exercises, etc. in the H and I established in the first semester of 2012, B and C established in the second semester of 2012, and I established in the first semester of 2013, and other points);

7. The method of sexual assessment is inappropriate from January 2008 to January 201, 201.