The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant charged with the facts charged is an electrical engineer, the victim B (38), the taxi engineer, and the relation between passengers and the engineer.

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on May 10, 2019, when the Defendant: (b) called “I am on the cab in front of the convenience store,” and (c) “I am in front of the convenience store, I am in Seoul,” and (d) the Defendant was working for the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the passenger,” and (d) the victim said “I am on three occasions during the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the passenger.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since a written agreement was submitted in the name of the victim including the victim’s intent not to punish the Defendant on October 7, 2019, the prosecution of the instant facts charged is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.