A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

around 15:10 on November 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was placed in Jeju-si, 15:10 on November 1, 2012, the Defendant: (b) confirmed that there was no first type of the victim D’s house located on the third floor of the building; and (c) continuously, the Defendant: (a) reported the network at a construction site located adjacent to the building; (b) opened a pipe attached to the building on the wall of the building; and (c) opened a window that was not corrected through the benda and intruded to the inside; and (d) opened a 400,000 won of the market price owned by the victim located in the west-si; and (b) cited Chapter 14 km of the market price of KRW 200,00,00 in the market price of KRW 10,100; and (c) cited Chapter 10,1000,000.

As a result, the defendant stolen the victim's property jointly with the person who was not the victim of his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to photographs of a damaged site);

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 331(2) and Article 331(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant criminal facts led to confession and reflect on the instant crime, it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant to the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime and was in the period of suspension of execution, and that the Defendant did not agree with the victim. Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition in consideration