1. From the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is not less than 100,660 square meters in the inner city:

A. As to the portion of November 11.19/100,660 shares, Defendant B shall attach November 29, 1990.

1. Part of the claims against the defendant 1 to 4 and 6 to 10

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208(3)3 (a) (b) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment by service by public notice) of the applicable provisions of law 1) Defendant 2 through 4, and Article 208(3)2 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment by publication by public notice)

2. The part of the claim against the defendant 5

A. The Registration of Real Estate Act provides that the registration shall be applied jointly by the person entitled to registration and the person liable for registration (Article 23(1)), while the registration shall be applied jointly by the said person (Article 23(4)). The case where the person liable for registration, other than the person entitled to registration, may apply for registration independently by the said person (Article 23(4)). The case where the person liable for registration, other than the person entitled to registration, may apply for registration in addition to the person entitled to registration in winning the registration, may escape from the liability due to deposit, etc., if the creditor delays the receipt of the registration. However, in the ordinary case of the obligation and the case of the obligation related to the registration, this method may not be used. Thus, where the person liable for registration is likely to suffer disadvantages in social life or law due to the fact that the registration

B. (See Supreme Court Decision 2000Da60708 delivered on February 9, 2001).

In full view of the health account, Gap evidence No. 1-4 and the purport of the entire arguments as to this case, defendant 5 acquired ownership of 3-3457-1/10 of the fifth floor among the real estate listed in the attached Table on August 27, 1999, and the ownership of the land under the above 3-3457 can be recognized as the fact that the ownership of the land under the above 3-3457 is 11.19/10060, and the sectional owner's right to the site is subject to the disposition of his exclusive ownership. Accordingly, according to the above facts of recognition, defendant 5 acquired the ownership of the exclusive ownership as above, thereby acquiring it on the site