A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced by the Seoul High Court to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, for ten months and two years of suspended execution, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 19th of the same month.

2. The Defendant and the related parties are the representative director of the construction business chain Co., Ltd., and E is the owner of G and H’s fraudulent interest and their representative who participated in the contract and disposal of the instant land, who are the owner of G and H’s share of 11,317 square meters in total (hereinafter “instant land”), who are the owner of G and H’s share of the land, and the representative director of J Co., Ltd. who performs civil engineering design and development activities, and K is the vice president of the said J, and L is the representative director of M Co., Ltd. who is the construction business chain.

3. The defendant, around November 29, 2006, decided to develop a warehouse and neighborhood living facilities on the land of this case jointly with E, and around that time I and K decided to take charge of the civil engineering design and development activities of the above project, and L decided to take charge of construction.

Defendant

Around December 2006, when I, K, L, and E are carrying out the business of the above business, I directed K to the effect that “In order to obtain a license for the land of this case as a warehouse site, it is necessary to take personnel management of the public official in charge of Kimpo-si in charge of Kimpo-si in order to obtain a license for the land of this case as a warehouse, etc.” It is necessary to give E a bribe.

Accordingly, the defendant, K, and L met E at the above D office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on December 2006, and K does not permit the change of use of part of the land of this case to the warehouse site. However, if Kimpo-si uses money to the public officials of Kimpo-si, it is permitted to use it as a warehouse site, and two persons in charge are in charge. However, if the permission is granted as a warehouse site, two persons in charge may be at issue in the future audit and inspection, and two persons in charge may demand KRW 100 million each."