Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 19, 2016, at around 19:20, the Defendant used the victim E (34) who requested that the Defendant interfered with the passage of the vehicle by reporting the Defendant’s interference with the passage of the vehicle on the front side of D Mart located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the roadway and obstructing the passage of the vehicle on the roadway, and, at the same time, read as “this son, Nin must be in a superior relationship,” and booms the victim E’s breathroth by hand, and followed the defect that the victim E tried to escape from the victim F (36 years of age).

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims respectively.

2. In the case where the victim G (n, 32 years of age) reported the dispute between E and the Defendant, his husband, as stated in paragraph 1, between the victim G (n, 32 years of age) and his wife, at the date, time and place described in paragraph 1, the Defendant - - - - - the victim - the victim -

Sheba ker's walk ker's walk, because there is no walk.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “......”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, E, and F;

1. Application of the G Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant alleged that the victim E was satisfing and driving away from his/her seat, and only satisfing the victim E and F, and did not assault the victim E and F, or satisfing the victim G.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case (i.e., the victims from the investigative agency to the instant court consistent with the victim E, G, and H (victim G).