Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business [2013 Go-Ma1733] Around April 21, 2013, the Defendant tried to find four times under the influence of alcohol from 00:00 to 03:20 on April 21, 2013, and the victim D (50 years of age) who operates the said establishment was drinking. However, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by force by force, such as: (a) the victim’s desire to take a bath, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e.,

2. Defluoration [2013 Many1734]

A. At around 13:35 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol on the street in front of the F of the Masan-si, the victim E, a person who was a person who was in charge of the crime of the Taekwondo of neighboring buildings, took a bath to the victim E, who was in charge of the crime of the crime of the Taekwondo of the victim, and subsequently, upon receiving the Defendant’s report, the police officer H and police officer I et al. were to arrive in the police box, and the victim Ha and the victim Ha et al. “I met the low weather test. I see the weather year that was laid down.”

The Defendant openly insultd the victim by putting the above bath while maintaining the seal members and their surrounding persons.

B. At around 13:50 on the same day, the Defendant’s insult of the Victim H and I at the above location, 13:50 on the same day: (a) Ha was asked the Defendant of the background of the Defendant’s report; (b) Ha was the victim; (c) Ha was the victim; (d) Ha was the victim; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; (c) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (d) Ha was the victim of the crime; (d) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) Ha was the victim of the crime; and (e) was the victim

The Defendant, while maintaining the seal members and their surrounding actors, openly insulting victims by putting them a bath as above.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 173]

1. The defendant;