The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The accused shall give public notice of the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. The summary of the facts charged of the instant case was around 20:00 on September 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) located at the lower-lane parking lot for the summer-to-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-S to-Sto-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to-S to

The defendant, on the ground that the victim took photographs, was injured by the victim's face 4 to 5 times, and the victim's face was 14 days for treatment.

2. Summary of the grounds for appeal and the judgment of the court below

A. (1) Although the Defendant had a dispute with the victim at the time and place indicated in the instant facts charged, the Defendant received part of the Defendant’s vehicle back part of the victim’s vehicle.

The facts charged are completely different from the facts that the victim was drinking.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below on unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court also asserted to the same effect as the grounds for appeal for mistake of facts, and the lower court rejected its assertion in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated, and recognized the fact that the Defendant was the victim as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

The victim consistently stated that the Defendant was flicked from the investigative agency to the time of this court that the victim was flicking with the Defendant and flicked 4 to 5 times the face of the victim, and that the witness D’s statement also conforms to this.

The victim of this case.