1. Defendant B of the first instance judgment, including the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, expanded by this court.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ status as Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant insurance company”) is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the G-to-pubed vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) owned by F and the Defendant C is the intention to work at the “I Hospital” located in Seo-gu Daejeon (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and Defendant D and E is the operator of the Defendant hospital.

The plaintiff is a person who suffered injuries due to traffic accidents that occur in conflict with the defendant's vehicle while driving a motor vehicle, and received medical treatment, such as surgery, from the defendant C at the defendant hospital.

B. On July 21, 2011, the occurrence of the instant traffic accident and the passage to the Defendant hospital: (a) around 15:40 on July 21, 201, the Plaintiff was faced with the Defendant’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle moving to the exit at the same time from the left side of the Plaintiff’s running direction while the Plaintiff was moving to the road to the left at the left side of the road after completing the oil to the vehicle in the K station located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu. (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). As a result, the instant traffic accident conflicts with the Defendant’s upper part of the passenger bus left ahead of the left side of the vehicle and the upper part of the Defendant’s front part of the Defendant vehicle’s right side to the left side of the vehicle (the Defendant vehicle did not handle the insurance) (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).

(2) On July 22, 2011, the following day of the traffic accident, the Plaintiff: (a) sought medical treatment on the part of the Magsan National Assembly located in Daejeon; and (b) as a result of the radiation inspection, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by two weeks of cryp to the “infection base, fluorum base, brain-dead base, and satisum base” and was hospitalized from July 22, 201 to August 4, 2011.

3) On July 30, 201, when the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the above M&A clinic, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the National Institute of Radiological Sciences located in Daejeon on July 30, 201. As a result, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the “propinical signboard escape certificate No. 4-5.” (C) internal members of the Defendant Hospital and the Plaintiff by Defendant C, and the instant surgery and progress 1).