logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.08.22 2013고단1775
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court Sejong Housing Site Board, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 9, 2011.

1. The Defendant, a co-principal with V, conspireds to acquire money by deceiving a person who intends to purchase a heavy vehicle at V and the Internet site as if he sold it, and the Defendant, a false advertisement on the Internet bulletin board, and an incentiveing the buyer of the vehicle, and V, a deceitful vehicle purchaser, takes charge of withdrawing the remitted money.

On October 18, 2011, the Defendant, along with V, inserted a letter that “The Defendant sold the 2009-type Mear Mear Mear Mear Mear Mega in the mutual descriptive room located in Pyeongtaek-dong, Pyeongtaek-si,” and falsely stated that “The Defendant should receive the down payment and the intermediate payment from the victim X who reported it, and received 4.3 million won from the victim who believed it to the new bank account under the name of the Defendant as the down payment and the intermediate payment.”

However, the defendant and V did not own the teteme vehicle, and there was no intention or ability to sell the teteme vehicle to the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant conspired with V and received 4.3 million won from the victim by deceiving the victim.

The Defendant, including that, from August 22, 201 to January 28, 2012, received total amount of KRW 51,500,000 against the nine victims, including the victim Z, as shown in attached Table 1, from around August 22, 2011 to January 28, 2012.

2. On April 23, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim A, the victim AB, and the victim AC posted an advertisement on selling “arching presses” on the website of the SKKk (htp:/www.W. carcar.com) at the Defendant’s residence, and made a false statement that the victim A, who has contacted, should receive down payment and make a transaction, and requests down payment.

However, the fact is that the victim receives the down payment from the victim AA.

arrow