logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.09 2016가단112815
사용료
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 24,080,280 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 15, 2017 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a new passenger construction company on November 12, 201 (hereinafter “new passenger construction”)

) The Cheongwon-gu Bsports Center (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) and Cheongju-si

(B) A contract was entered into for the supply of high-tensionA electricity (hereinafter referred to as “instant electricity supply contract”).

(2) From July 1, 2010, the Defendant leased 1 and 2 underground among the instant buildings from around July 1, 2010, and operated an indoor Arabic link (hereinafter “instant Arabic link”).

3) The new passenger construction has collected management expenses from the lessees of the instant building, including the Defendant, and has paid part of them as electricity charges. (b) The Defendant’s request for postponement and submission of confirmation letter 1) The Plaintiff, who was in default of the repetitive electric charges for new passenger construction and the closure of business on April 30, 2014, ordered the suspension of the supply of electricity for the instant building.

2) On May 14, 2014, the Defendant requested the suspension of the supply of electricity to the Plaintiff on May 14, 2014, that “The Defendant, the representative of the ice Link, would pay in full the unpaid electricity charges by August 2014 in order to prevent the suspension of the supply of electricity, and would withdraw the guarantee measures as requested by the Plaintiff if the Defendant, who is the representative of the ice Link, is in arrears for the next one month, and would withdraw the guarantee measures.” (hereinafter “instant request for postponement”).

(3) On January 26, 2015, the instant building was awarded a successful bid to a third party in the auction procedure for real estate rent.

4) On the other hand, on January 27, 2015, the Defendant continued to operate the instant Arabic link with the successful bidder’s defense of the right of retention, and on the other hand, confirmed on January 27, 2015 that the Plaintiff was liable to pay electricity charges as the actual user in using electricity in the instant building (hereinafter “instant confirmation”).

(c) The Plaintiff’s supply of electricity and the payment of electricity charges 1) Defendant.

arrow