(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고단4214

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고단4214

업무방해

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for one year, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants: (a) around August 28, 2015, on the grounds that the Defendant 20:50 on August 28, 2015, at the entrance of the victim D (the age of 69) in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “EM”), ice cream prices are high; (b) Defendant A, as the victim resisted, walked the ice cream with a ice cream, walked the cream with a view to the victim; and (c) Defendant B, at the entrance of the entrance of the store, she took a bath to the victim, stating that the victim would not have any cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream cream.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the victim's business by force over about 15 minutes.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, recommended G to return home to the police box of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, but continued to take a bath to the said D and obstructed his business. As such, G used G to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of crime, and used G’s face to control again the Defendant as the head of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the suppression of police officers' crimes.

B. As the Defendant recommended the victim’s return home at the same time and place as that set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by publicly insulting the victim’s victim, who was reported by the residents of H and name, who are the above Empt operator D and D’s spouse, and whose name is unknown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (the Defendant B is on the second trial date)

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of police officers dispatched;

1. The pertinent Article of criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원성남지원 2020.12.16 2020고정817

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.11.27 2013고단1004

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.12.04 2014고정527

-서울서부지방법원 2015.05.26 2015고정54

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.11.25 2016고단710