The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the judgment: The defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case.

In the case of the instant crime on December 30, 2016, there seems to be a reason to take account of the circumstances.

The defendant was sentenced to a fine of 20,00 won due to a violation of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces in 1976.

On December 30, 2016, the crime of this case was committed against the victim on the ground that the defendant did not repay the borrowed money to the victim. On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed against the victim on December 30, 2016, and was committed by the investigative agency on May 15, 2017, and returned the victim's name by her string away from the victim's face to the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2017.

Damage has not been recovered.

All the circumstances of sentencing and the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, including the above favorable circumstances, unfavorable circumstances, the defendant's age and character environment, relation to victims, motive means of crime, results of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., as well as the overall conditions of sentencing and the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (from June to September 2);

A. Basic crimes (i.e., self-injury on May 15, 2017) / [the types of self-injury] / General Injury (i.e., general injury) / [the person subject to special sentencing] / [the scope of recommended punishment / [the scope of recommended punishment from June to two years] aggravated area.

B. There is no one type (general injury) (the general person in charge of sentencing) of concurrent crimes (the type of self-injury on December 30, 2016) (the scope of recommending punishment) basic area (the scope of recommending punishment between April and June).

C. In full view of the total amount of imprisonment with prison labor for the final sentence scope according to the standards for handling multiple crimes, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant’s appeal is groundless.