1. The appeal filed by the Counterclaim Plaintiff is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Counterclaim Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Grounds for this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance

(c).

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of paragraph (1), except for adding A evidence No. 9 to the grounds for recognition of the end of the claim as follows. Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Use]

C. The number of the instant hospital’s doctors was 6 on December 2003, but around 2007, around 9, around 11, and around 13 on October 2012. The sales amount of the instant hospital was 6,37,561,00 won in the year 205, and 7,964,202,00 won in the instant hospital was 10,376,783,00 won in the instant 207, 207, 207, 207, 207, 207, 206, 207, 207, 205, 207, 207, 207, 206, 207, 205, 207, 206, 207, 205, 206, 207, 2017, 2014.

The Counterclaim Plaintiff and the Counterclaim Defendant agreed to open the instant hospital from March 2006 to March 2006 after the three-year contract period stipulated in the instant business agreement had expired, and the Counterclaim Defendant settled the income of the Counterclaim Plaintiff by reducing the direct expenses incurred in treating the Lessee from the sales amount of the Lessee in accordance with the instant business agreement. (ii) However, from March 2006 upon the expiration of the said contract period, the Counterclaim Plaintiff and the Counterclaim Defendant agreed to share the expenses incurred in operating the hospital in addition to the direct expenses incurred by the Lessee. (iii) From March 2006, the Counterclaim Plaintiff and the Counterclaim Defendant agreed to share the expenses incurred in operating the hospital in addition to the direct expenses incurred by the Lessee.