logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.11 2012가합539059
기타(금전)
Text

1. All claims filed by the Lessee are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Reasons

3) Since 2006, the Counterclaim Plaintiff and the Counterclaim Defendant have set different ways to share the expenses incurred in the operation of the instant hospital every year. There has been conflict between the Counterclaim Plaintiff and the Counterclaim Plaintiff regarding the expenses that the Counterclaim should share. e., preparation of the same business contract for the payment of taxes and health insurance premiums and the Counterclaim Defendant paid taxes and health insurance fees on the premise that they hold 50% shares until 2008, respectively. However, in 209, the Counterclaim Defendant agreed to pay taxes and health insurance fees on the premise that they hold 30% shares in 70% and 70% shares in 2010, and accordingly, the Counterclaim Defendant and the Counterclaim Defendant agreed to pay taxes and health insurance fees on the premise that they hold 17% shares in 83% shares in 2010, and the Counterclaim Defendant and the Counterclaim Defendant and the Counterclaim Defendant set up the same business contract on the premise that they hold 15% shares in 2009 to 2010.

arrow