1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On November 8, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on November 8, 201 and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on January 27, 201.

On December 7, 2012, the Defendant issued a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 10, 2013, but was dismissed on June 27, 2014, and was notified of the dismissal decision on November 17, 2014.

[Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings began from around 2002 to work at a number of non-governmental organizations (NGO) located in Afrantan, and from around April 2009, the Plaintiff provided interpretation services at the Red Cross located in Afranchis.

Apististan is very unstable for the security of the U.S. because of its hostile activities in the U.S., and the fact that the plaintiff worked together with the U.S. people in the Red Cross is known to the Lesistan to find the plaintiff and murdering the plaintiff.

The plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea to harm the above threat, and the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

In fact, since the United States and the United Kingdom attack Afrantan in 2001 and collapseed the right of the Afrantan, the Afrantan became a weak human rights and security situation due to the civil war situation.

However, the International Security Support Group (ISOF) which is led by the NAO continues to be engaged in activities to maintain public order and security in and around the water supply, together with the AFS Security Group.