logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.26 2018나59892
보증금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiffs (Appointeds) and the designated parties who fall under each of the following amounts:

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a person operating the “L Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in J and K, and the Appointed Party E is a person operating the “O Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in M and N in Silung-si, the Selection Party E’s wife, the Selection Party E’s children, and the Selection Party D’s children.

1. Concluding a lease agreement on behalf of any third party;

2. Vicarious collection of rents (including rents for unpaid rents);

3. Vicarious collection of down payment and monthly rent deposit (wages account-P Bank QI).

8. In the case of a contract related to a lease, it shall be the name of “building owner”.

On April 29, 2011, the Defendant acquired the ownership of the fourth-story neighborhood living facilities and detached houses (hereinafter “instant building”) on G’s ground (Evidence 1) and, on the same day, drafted a power of delegation on consignment management of building (hereinafter “the instant delegation”) with respect to the instant building, with the name of “H”, which is a real estate brokerage business and real estate rental and management business.

(A) From May 6, 2013 to May 8, 2013, 201, the term of lease of the object of lease (united building of this case) (united building of this case) (united building No. 28,000,000 won from May 9, 2013 to May 8, 2015, Plaintiff 20, 30,000 won from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2014, and Plaintiff 20, 30,000 won from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016 (united building No. 30,000,000 won from January 16, 2014 to December 31, 2016, Plaintiff 20, 30,000 won from May 24, 2014 to June 31, 2015, respectively.

arrow