logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.11 2016고단4557
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 18, 2016 to around 22:30 on September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol at the F main point operated by the victim E at a two-way level; and (b) the victim E wishes to have the victim returned home from the damaged while drinking alcohol at the F main point operated by the victim E at a two-way level; and (c) the victim E “I am the same year as the bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of bit

“I wishing to do so,” and referred to as “Ihnhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Accordingly, the victim I, a police officer belonging to the Gyeonggi Police Station H police station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report from the victim G, and the victim J continued to “I, a police officer belonging to the Gyeonggi Police Station H police station, I am fribly,” and the victim J.

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim E at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, and obstructed the victim’s main business operation for a period of one hour by force, such as taking the victim’s bath, taking sound, and pushing the victim with his/her view.

3. On September 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in the act of committing an act in the line of duty at the H box located in K at Yangju-si for the reasons specified in paragraph 1; and (b) was asked the police officer I questions about his personal information.

Accordingly, the Defendant took a bath to the police officer I, took the face of I at one time by drinking, and assaulted the police officer who was in charge of the H police box at one time to walk the part of the police officer J's sagnter.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, I, J and G;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to one violence face photograph, CD;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow