The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the defendant's grounds for appeal is that the punishment of the court below (fine 1,500,000) is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances in which there was no yellow situation due to the default of bills and outstanding loans received as payment for the construction work at the time of the testimony of this case.

From the time when the defendant was investigated by the police, he or she recognized the false testimony, and reflects the wrong fact, and it is recognized that there is an economic difficulty due to disputes related to construction cost.

However, in the case of Seoul Southern District Court 2010Da3364, Seoul Southern District Court 2010Gao3364, the main issues were whether the Edemban has the obligation to pay the construction cost directly to F. The contents of the defendant's testimony are directly related to the above issues. Accordingly, in the court's hearing of the above case, the contents of the defendant's false testimony have been affected or have been highly likely to have been affected, and perjury requires strict punishment as an serious crime that causes confusion and uncertainty in the judicial action of the State by hindering the court's hearing for the discovery of substantial truth. In addition, considering the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case such as the method of the crime of this case, background and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age and character and conduct, the punishment of the court below is without merit. Thus, the defendant

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.