beta
Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is KRW 24,265,598.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 10, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on February 10, 2010, with a contract for the floor repair painting work (3,476 square meters in a foundation’s 1 set floor Muar repair area, 568 square meters in a foundation’s 2 frequency floor Muar repair area, 300 square meters in a second floor floor Muar repair area, 4,344 square meters in a total amount, 4,344 square meters in a foundation (hereinafter “instant contract”) to give a subcontract to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”). The main contents are as follows.
1) The construction cost shall be KRW 40,000 per square meter; the construction period shall be set from February 12, 2010 to June 16, 201; 2) there shall be no defects in the completion inspection of the forest pester.
3) On the following day at the time of the request for a defect, Party A shall repair and make an increase or decrease in working expenses, on its own initiative, if Party A (Plaintiff) fails to comply with the request for defect.
5) The settlement of accounts is settled on the following day after the settlement of the written order for the construction work. B) The Defendant, via B, performed the said construction work after the conclusion of the instant contract. However, there were defects, such as the occurrence of painting floor of the construction site and the separation of the boundary area after five days after the completion of the construction work, and the Plaintiff performed the construction work for the repair of defects, and the cost required for the construction work is equivalent to KRW 24,265,598. C. The construction work under the instant contract was completed around October 30, 2010. The Plaintiff received KRW 402,647,062, excluding those for the portion for which part of the construction work was not carried out, until November 30, 2010, and the Defendant received KRW 130,000,000 from the Plaintiff in relation to the instant contract, evidence Nos. 130,000,000 among the construction work cost, evidence Nos. 1 through 47, and evidence No.
2. The main office;