logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.15 2017나113868
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it.

However, in the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “taking over the I’s license” as stated in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to “taking over the M’s license (see the result of the inquiry reply as to the fact inquiry as of May 14, 2018 to the south-gu Office of East-gu Office in this Court and the 10th part of the judgment of the court of first instance)” and the phrase “I’s license” as stated in the fifth part of the judgment of the court of first instance as “M’s license” respectively.

2. Additional determination

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Recognition Nos. 1, 4, and 10 (if there are more than one number, the number will be included, unless special reference is given);

hereinafter the same shall apply.

(A) According to each description or image of this court, each fact-finding reply from April 16, 2018 and each fact-finding reply from May 14, 2018 to the Dong-gu Office of Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the following facts and circumstances may be acknowledged, according to the purport of the whole pleadings, and each of the following facts and circumstances may be acknowledged. A) among the buildings of the 2nd E (the “instant building” in the judgment of the court of first instance) of the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu (hereinafter “the instant building”), where the “part 66.06 square meters in a restaurant among the first floor” is leased to the Plaintiff, the lease agreement of the instant building, which is the lease agreement of the real estate of September 2, 2016, stating that the leased object is “6.06 square meters in a restaurant on the 66.06

(A) The part on the first floor of the instant building consists of the following pictures (see Evidence 1 and 4.2). Of the above part on the first floor, the size of the left-hand (retail stores) part of the said part of the first floor is 6.06 square meters and is 6.06 square meters, and the NA, a general restaurant, is operating. The size of the part (housing and retail stores) is 58.5 square meters and the part (see Certificate 1 and 4.2) is operation of “M,” which is a resting restaurant, is 58.5 square meters and the part is operated (see, e.g., the fact-finding reply made on May 14, 2018 to the East-gu Office in the East-gu Office of the court (see, e.g., the fact-finding reply made on May 14, 2018)

arrow