logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.09.13 2017나103717
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is that "the result of the inquiry and reply to the director of the tax office of the court of first instance to the director of the tax office of the court of first instance" is "the result of the inquiry and reply to the director of the tax office of the court of first instance to the director of the tax office of the court of the first instance", and each "the result of the request for inquiry and reply to the director of the court of first instance to the director of the tax office of the court of the first instance to the result of the inquiry and reply to the director of the court of the court of the first instance to the head of the court of the court of the first instance," and each "the result of the request for inquiry of the fees of the court of first instance to the director of the court of the court of the court of first instance to the result of the inquiry and reply to the director of the court of the court of the first instance to the

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow