(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.17 2020나3146

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.17 2020나3146

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A, which constitutes the money ordering payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the court’s liability for damages is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The Defendant’s argument in the trial related to the limitation of liability does not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance trial, and even if all evidence are re-examineed, the first instance judgment on this part is acceptable). 2. The grounds for this part of the scope of liability for damages are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment in the first instance trial except for the advanced part as follows, thereby admitting it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Attached Form

The damages calculation table is added to the attached table of damages calculation in this judgment.

(f) Paragraph (f) of section 5 of the first instance judgment is not more than 20.

(f) According to the theory of lawsuit, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff A for damages: ① KRW 161,50,655 (property damages of KRW 136,50,655) and KRW 153,615,603, which is the cited amount of the judgment of the first instance; KRW 153,603, the cited amount of the judgment of the first instance; 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act from May 20, 2017 to December 11, 2019, which is the date of the first instance judgment; 12% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment; 7,885,052, which is additionally cited in the first instance judgment; 20% per annum from May 20, 2017 to the date of full payment; 15% per annum per annum 50% per annum per annum per annum; and 20% per annum per annum per annum per Plaintiff C.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs.

참조조문

-민법

-민사소송법 제420조

-소송촉진 등에 관한 특례법

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.04 2019나43469

-울산지방법원 2020.02.13 2019나10507

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.10 2020나444

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.09 2019나53558