Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2012, at around 17:00, the Defendant driving a B Loneex as his duties, and led to the cross-section of the Cystru in the same Eup/Myeon area in the same Eup/Myeon area as the U.S. At the same time as the U.S., the Defendant continued to cross-section of the Cystru in the same Eup/Myeon area.

At this point, the intersection where the red signal is installed and the traffic of vehicles is high, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop or yield to prevent accidents in order not to obstruct the passage of other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not check the passage of the vehicle in the intersection and did not temporarily stop before the passage through the intersection, and received the front part of the victim C(60 years old)'s driving due to occupational negligence, which occurred at the intersection without having to make a temporary stop prior to the passage.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the above C to suffer injury, such as a escape from the right angle, which requires approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (Evidence 36 pages);

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;