logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.07.17 2014고단12
공갈등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who was in charge of D mobile area from March 2013 to July 8, 2013, and a person who was in charge of E mobile area from July 30, 2013 to December 10, 2013.

The Defendant, as a means of preparing living expenses, etc. for those who have no particular income in addition to the allowances for attracting advertisements at a newspaper company that he works for the Defendant, returned to the large-scale construction site, cooking, etc. using the identity of the reporter, and tried to publish the environmental issues of the relevant workplace, violations of the Fire Services Act, etc., or to receive money and valuables from the victims by using words that seem to file a civil petition with the competent administrative agency.

1. On September 17, 2013, the Defendant found the victim F’s “F” construction site located in G on September 17, 2013, and found H, a construction public office, at the construction site, “The sewage discharged from the construction site is flowing into the sea, without properly installing the facilities, and the sewage discharged from the construction site is flowing into the sea. In a newspaper, the Defendant filed a civil petition against the victim at the construction site. The Defendant, who is in charge of the victim’s management, made H cage by means of speaking as if he were to be an article into the construction site, and transferred the said construction site to E account as advertising expenses.

2. The victim's voluntary conflict and attempted conflict to the victim I corporation;

A. On September 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the new construction site of K, which is located in the Singu J on September 17, 2013, the Defendant issued to the victim I, the representative of the victim I Co., Ltd., who had been performing the relevant civil works, an article to gather news at the construction site; (b) in the manner of speaking as an article about the said construction site managed by the victim as if he were to be an article into an article; and (c) issued to L the same amount of KRW 80,00,000,000, in cash, and KRW 200,000,000, respectively.

B. The Defendant, on October 2013, Article 1(a) of the Police Officers Act.

arrow