1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiffs are married by G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), who died on February 27, 2016, Defendant C is the head of the deceased, and Defendant D is the spouse of Defendant C.

On July 14, 2011, with respect to the portion of 707/1,147 square meters among the portion of 1,147 square meters in Namyang-si, which was owned by the deceased, the ownership transfer registration was completed on the ground of the gift made on June 20, 2010 for each of the Defendants on July 14, 201. On the same day, the share of 1,208 square meters (1,408 square meters out of 1,607 square meters, which was owned by the deceased, was divided into F, E, 1,408 square meters into F, and 200 square meters out of the above F, 1,408 square meters in size as of July 25, 201, each of the said F, the area of F, became final 1,208 square meters in the name of Defendant C, 204/608 square meters in the name of Defendant C, 207.

(hereinafter “instant real estate”). The deceased’s successors are J and children, the wife of the deceased, the Plaintiffs, Defendant C, K, and L, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5 (including additional numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 4-3, and Eul evidence Nos. 4-3, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the gist of the plaintiffs' assertion by the plaintiffs is that although the deceased did not donate the real estate of this case to the defendants, the defendants completed the registration of transfer of ownership illegally by forging relevant documents. Thus, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendants

Therefore, since the real estate of this case is inherited to the plaintiffs as the inherited property of the deceased, each of the inheritance shares of 2/13, the defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on the restoration of real name with respect to each of the plaintiffs' shares in the real estate of this case.

Around June 2005, the deceased asserted by the Defendants donated the real estate owned by the deceased, including the instant real estate, to the Defendants.