logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.31 2018고단3756
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on October 18, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 18, 2016, but on February 25, 2017, the said suspended sentence was revoked, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the previous main prison on September 26, 2017.

"2018 Highest 3756"

1. On June 11, 2018, at around 03:00, the Defendant was provided with “E cafeteria” operated by the victim D in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and even if he orders food, he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he did not have any money under the number of times. In doing so as to have the victim’s employees paid the price for the ordered food, the Defendant was provided with 10,000 won in total from the said employee, namely, i.e., e., 10,000 won and 1 son.

2. When an employee of the above victim was prevented from smoking at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties “I am pathy,”

Mackn't interfered with the victim's employees, who are employed by the victim's employees, and continue to be "Ick for male test" to the victim's employees;

It was difficult to have avoided a disturbance for about one hour, such as referring to a large amount of male dynasty, hynasty “dynasty,” etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

On June 8, 2018, the Defendant, around 14:00, at G cafeteria located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on June 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the price for the ordered food; (b) had the intent or ability to pay the price for the food; (c) had the victim H (49 years of age) who is the owner of the business by deceiving the victim H (49 years of age) to pay the price for the ordered food; and (d) had the victim been provided with 12,00 won per share and 1 Byung per share.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 3756]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of I;

1. An investigation report (verification of CCTV images at the E cafeteria), CDs and CCTV images;

1. Photographs of the screen screen;

1. The records of the offence in its holding:

arrow