Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu70746 ( October 05, 2016)
Case Number of the previous trial
Early High Court Decision 2015J 5818 ( October 15, 2016)
Title
Whether the attorney fees which are members of the law firm shall be regarded as the revenue amount of the law firm.
Summary
Until a final and conclusive judgment is rendered, the Plaintiff maintained the legal representative status of the claim for damages of this case until the final and conclusive judgment was rendered, and as long as the Plaintiff received damages ordering payment in the judgment, it cannot be deemed that the transaction or income
Related statutes
Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2016Du58956 ( October 03, 2017)
Plaintiff-Appellant
Law Firm Dong○
Defendant-Appellee
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu70746 Decided October 05, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
2017.02.03
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Of the costs of appeal, the costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of
February 3, 2017