logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 02. 03. 선고 2016두58956 판결
법무법인 구성원인 변호사수임료를 법무법인의 수입금액으로 볼 것인지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu70746 ( October 05, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Early High Court Decision 2015J 5818 ( October 15, 2016)

Title

Whether the attorney fees which are members of the law firm shall be regarded as the revenue amount of the law firm.

Summary

Until a final and conclusive judgment is rendered, the Plaintiff maintained the legal representative status of the claim for damages of this case until the final and conclusive judgment was rendered, and as long as the Plaintiff received damages ordering payment in the judgment, it cannot be deemed that the transaction or income

Related statutes

Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du58956 ( October 03, 2017)

Plaintiff-Appellant

Law Firm Dong○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu70746 Decided October 05, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

2017.02.03

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

February 3, 2017

arrow