1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court of first instance has used “as described in Section (c)” as “as described in Section (d) below; and (b) the reasoning for the first instance judgment is as stated in the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for addition of the following:

2. The addition;

A. On August 14, 2012, the Defendant submitted additional evidence No. 12, No. 12, No. 23-2 (amended Contract, Aug. 3, 2012), No. 21, No. 23-2 (amended Contract, No. 14, Aug. 14, 2012), “No. 12,” and “No. 23-2 (amended Contract, Aug. 14, 2012),” written evidence No. 23-2, “No. 12,” and “No. 23-2,” written evidence No. 23-2, which appears to be consistent with the Defendant’s aforementioned assertion, are not sufficient to acknowledge that the remainder of the entire construction cost, including additional construction cost, was determined as KRW 450,00,00,000,000.”

Even if the authenticity of each of the above documentary evidence can be recognized, the evidence as mentioned above.