1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a company established for the purpose of the educational service business, franchise business, printing and publishing business, etc. of the brand "C".

On August 12, 2011, the Plaintiff submitted a certificate of No. 1 of the mark "Franchis Agreement" to the Defendant under the name of the Plaintiff's wife, and the existence of the original copy is not confirmed unlike the evidence No. 12 of the Plaintiff's certificate, and the part of the business area (Article 5 (1) 1) and the contract term (Article 6 (1)) and the contract term (Article 5 (1) 12) are the same as the relevant part of Paragraph (12).

A) The part of the designation fee of a branch office (Article 31(2)) and the portion of the designation fee of a branch office (Article 31(2)) are not written as evidence in light of the fact that there is doubt that the printing bottom of each of the relevant parts is not well-known, and that there is a suspicion that she would not ex post facto delete the contents indicated on the bottom, even if the printing bottom of each of the relevant parts is not pre-printed, it shall not be written as evidence; hereinafter referred to as “instant branch contract”) and then the renewal of the contract was made once on January 1, 2013.

The main contents of the instant branch contract are as follows.

[Mark] The name of the branch office of the C's "C" contract: Unlike the remaining parts printed with the same letters among the contract of this case, the part which is written with the sign shall be expressed in the white letter.

Articles 5(1)1 and 6. of the name of a branch office, representative, date of contract, and details of contract among the contract signs.