beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In around 198, the Defendant graduated from Cuniversity radiation department for about 11 years, and then worked as a radiation doctor at several hospitals, including E members in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D, and then, for about 1 year, the damage adjustment office subsidized the damage adjustment business and provided the damage evaluation services at the damage adjustment office to obtain overall knowledge about the claim for disability insurance benefits, such as the issuance of a certificate of disability diagnosis, and thereby, intended to receive and distribute the insurance proceeds by receiving the insurance proceeds under the "insurance Fraud" method, even though the facts against new citizens F, G, and H introduced by them are merely mere simple salt, etc., and it is not an injury to the degree of disability diagnosis.
On December 27, 2012, the Defendant received a request from the F to undergo a disability examination to receive disability insurance money even though he merely suffered minor injuries, such as Madle’s salt, tension, and tensions, from the F, due to a traffic accident, and received a written diagnosis of disability to F through the J-type Department K of the hospital at issue, which had a usual friendly relationship with F, and received a written diagnosis of disability insurance money from the victim Mmerz Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. on January 31, 2013, and then received KRW 2,540,000 as disability insurance money from the victim Mmerz Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. on or around January 31, 2013.
In addition, the Defendant, in collusion with F, G, etc. from May 30, 201 to March 5, 2014, received a total of KRW 382,479,290 in the same way through a total of 76 times, such as the attached crime list, and acquired it, and attempted to obtain a total of KRW 30,000,000 on one occasion, but failed to pay insurance money by the insurance company and failed to do so.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's oral statements are made in the fifth place;