A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bribery) at the Seoul Central District Court on the grounds of imprisonment with labor for one year and six months, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2014, but on September 23, 2016, a claim for the cancellation of the said suspended sentence was accepted in the Jung-gu District Court’s Senior District Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s High Court’s final decision on December

【Crimes】 2016 High Order 4913】

1. On October 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:00 on October 27, 2016, the first floor D clubs of the 1st floor underground of the Songpa-gu Seoul building, Songpa-gu, Seoul, operated as if the Defendant would pay the normal drinking value to the victim E, and accordingly, the Defendant demanded two-way (sour), five C, and one of the instant entertainment and entertainment loans.

However, there is no money that the defendant would pay the above amount in the number, and the cash card is delivered to the victim and the balance is only 7,000 won, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and, in other words, acquired the victim with the delivery of an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 300,000 at the market price from the victim.

2. The Defendant, upon receiving 112 reports at the date, time, and place of Paragraph 1, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender from G, a police officer of the Song-gu Police Station F District, who was dispatched to the Defendant, and then thought that he was unable to faithfully perform the community service order at his government-protection observation office, and stated that he was unable to faithfully perform the community service order, “H” as the name of the person who was aware of in his usual book in the column of the letter of confirmation on arrest of flagrant offenders, and entered “H” and “I” as the resident registration number in the column of his written statement.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising his right.

3. The Defendant at the time, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) of this Article, issued a written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender who forged his/her signature and written statement.