beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 1, 2016, at around 21:30 on September 21, 2016, the Defendant was committed as if the Defendant would pay the drinking value normally by stating that “D main points operated by the Victim C in Busan District, Busan District, the Defendant reported the public relations signboards installed at the entrance of the establishment, and sent the drinking value to the victim.”
However, in fact, the defendant was in a state of being designated due to the failure to pay a fine at the time, and there was only 66,000 won in cash, so even if he was provided by the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally.
Defendant deceiving the victim as above and was provided with alcohol equivalent to KRW 178,00,00, such as two weeks, at the same place.
2. On September 2, 2016, at the same place as around 01:49 around September 2, 2016, the Defendant, who signed the above investigation, was arrested as a flagrant offender from the police officer F affiliated with the Busan Police Station E District, and was found to have failed to pay a fine, and thus, was willing to have his/her punishment G happiness.
Accordingly, the Defendant indicated “G” in the “written confirmation of arrest of flagrant offenders” and submitted it to the said F, and on the same day, the Defendant was transferred to the office of criminal watch of the Busan Police Station located on the road No. 111-ro, Busan High-ro, Busan High-ro, Busan High-ro, and was investigated by the Inspector H, and then entered “G” at the end of the “written interrogation of suspect” and sent it to the said H.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the signature of G name, and delivered the forged signature to F and H as if it was duly formed.
3. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant, who damaged public goods, re-contributed in the Busan High Police Station at the Busan High Police Station at around 02:50, when the Defendant’s fingerprints was asked to seek to use his/her personal information from the above H that verified that the Defendant’s fingerprint is inconsistent with the former G’s fingerprint.