Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
The seized Dogra (DS126571) 1 and groposium (DS401121) 1 each.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 06:50 on March 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went into the “E Hospital” located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu; (b) opened a 8th floor public relations room entrance that was not corrected for the purpose of the victim C to steals property; and (c) intrudes into the said hospital; (d) cut off one of the 1,450,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession, which is the victim’s possession of the above hospital’s right to property; and (e) cut off one of the 7,50,000,000 won at the victim’s market price, which is the victim’s possession of the above hospital; and (e) intruded the building 20 times in total, including 7-21,23-27, each year, among the list of crimes in attached Form No. 27.
2. Night building thief;
A. On November 25, 2011, at around 20:10, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded the entrance that was not corrected for the purpose of theft of property from “H” operated by the victim G in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (b) stolen property worth KRW 4,30,000,000, including a bank equivalent to KRW 350,000,000 at the market price of the victim’s possession, which was placed on the corridor ske, and cash KRW 80,00.
B. On October 8, 2012, around 20:30 on October 20, 2012, the Defendant opened and intrudeed a gate that was not corrected for the purpose of theft of property in the “K Postnatal Care Center” working for the victim J in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, and opened the clothes of the employee spons, and stolen the Defendant with the property of KRW 128,000,000, totaled of KRW 128,000, the market value of the victim’s possession.
3. Violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and fraud Defendant are presumed to be customers when they are buried in M, etc. M, M, etc. in Gyeyang-gu Incheon L on September 14, 2010, and purchased a uniform equivalent to 239,000 won at the market price, without following the procedures for modification of indictment to the extent that it is deemed that there is no concern that the Defendant would have any substantial disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’s right to defense when committing the crimes listed in the [Attachment 2] No.