The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 20, 2013, around 00:48, the Defendant: (a) accessed the Internet website Ntp (htp:/www.com) to ID “D; and (b) refused the democraticization of “in writing” in the article of the title “I” in the mind that he was unaware of the opposite student of the City Declaration, but wrong; (c) published the article of the title “htp” and openly insulting the victims on the Internet deemed to be unspecified by many and unspecified persons.

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim representative E prepared and submitted a written withdrawal of a complaint with the consent of the victim F and G, which was delegated by the victim F and G, around February 10, 2014 after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.