Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who resides in Yeongdeungpo-gu B apartment 102-204 in Suwon-si.

C (C) On February 22, 2013, after obtaining a permit for a successful bid of the said real estate under the procedure for a successful bid of the real estate, the following year:

3. On 13. At the above location, a notice was posted on the wall surface of the ward stating that execution officers D belonging to Suwon District Court shall not occupy or transfer the name by the original copy of the decision on "provisional disposition prohibiting the transfer of real estate possession" with executory power in the case No. 2013Kadan1802, which was decided by Suwon District Court's Suwon District Court's decision, accompanied with E (E).

Nevertheless, on March 16, 2013, the defendant removed the above notice as his hand without the permission of the above court and C, thereby impairing the utility of the above provisional disposition mark.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statement;

1. Investigation report (Protocol of Inspection by Execution Officer);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 140(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In view of the fact that the offense of this case by the defendant for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act prevents judicial enforcement, and that the defendant transferred his possession to other unauthorized occupant against the purpose of the provisional disposition, the punishment for the defendant is necessary, but the defendant is the first offender who has no record of the crime, the crime of this case is found to have been executed after the defendant returned to the workplace, and the proper explanation that the crime of this case was found to have been executed after the defendant returned to the workplace is not heard, and the notice of provisional disposition is deemed to have been removed by awareness of his/her relatives and relatives, the defendant is against himself/herself, is divided, and the defendant lives difficult to support and make it difficult to support the married children.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.