logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단3715
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

On July 5, 2012, A was sentenced to 10 months for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. in the Seoggu District Court's branch branch court on July 5, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on March 17, 2013.

[2013 Highest3715] Defendant A is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On June 1, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs without compensation from E at the Defendant’s office located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, by dilution them into coffee and diling them.

2. On June 2, 2013, at around 11:00, the Defendant received KRW 4.50,000 from K5 car parked on the front of the NAF, and arranged for sale and purchase of phiphones by receiving KRW 4.50,000 from F, and by delivering phiphones to F, which are wraped for white paper flicks.

[2013 Highest 4770] Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 22, 2013, at around 19:00, the Defendant issued KRW 300,000 to G on the roads near the Do farm basin located in the Namyang-si, Seoyang-si, and purchased approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs Mepta (i.e., a single philopon; hereinafter “philopon”).

B. At around 20:00 on March 22, 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.05g of philophones purchased from the parking lot of the Istst class (Haw line) located in the Female-gun, Gyeonggi-do, by means of inserting approximately 0.05gg of philophones purchased in the parking lot of the Ist class (Haw line) for one-time use and dilution the growth volume into his own left arms.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant 1-B

At the same time and place as in paragraph 1(a), approximately 0.05 g of philophones purchased from G was administered in a way that can be delivered to bel with bel, as in paragraph 1(a).

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Highest 3715]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. A letter of results of a urine inspection and a test report;

1. Investigation report (a copy of suspect interrogation protocol in addition to the case E).

arrow