Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A (56 years of age, women) and victim D (5 years of age, 55 years of age, 55 years of age) were in trade for business.

Around November 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the Incheon Metropolitan City Public Prosecutor’s Civil Service Center located in the Nam-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City, the public prosecutor’s office of the public prosecutor’s office, where the Defendant borrowed three promissory notes from the bank of Korea to the victim, but paid the price to the victim for the purpose of causing the loan by completing construction work on the construction site; (b) however, for the purpose of criminal punishment of the victim, the Defendant: (c) prepared a complaint stating the following false facts: (d) “When the victim lends three promissory notes from the bank of Korea around December 2011, the victim would be able to repay without a framework for the due date; (e) it is believed that it would be lent, and (e) delivered three promissory notes worth KRW 11.5 million, but instead, it was caused by failing to repay, and (e) submitted and received them to a public official with no knowledge of the name of the public prosecutor’s office; and (e) subsequently,

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Part of the investigation report (E counterpart investigation, etc.);

1. Some of the records, copies, etc. of fraudulent case filed against D by the suspect A;

1. The Defendant’s assertion as to the Defendant’s assertion on the copy of the cancellation notice of a financial investment agreement, the entire certificate of each registered matter, and the three copies of a promissory note, which was leased by D’s request, and that D’s deception was not made due to D’s failure to pay the amount, and thus, D’s accusation led to an accusation. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intention

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as seen earlier, i.e., D appears to have been well aware of the fact that the instant FF was suspended from the lack of funds and that the construction cost was not paid. As such, G, E, etc. were supplied with materials solely from G, E, etc., notwithstanding the absence of a reason to do the metal creative construction work.