A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:00 on January 24, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour, such as visiting “D” to the victim C (the 57-year old-old-old-old-old-age-old-age-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based

2. The Defendant damaged public goods on January 24, 2018 on the ground that the Defendant: (a) reported at the place specified in paragraph (1) around 03:05 on the same ground as that stated in paragraph (1) at the place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) sent out after receiving a report on 112 on the same ground; and (c) a slope F, etc. belonging to the Jeju Police Station

20 6 22 62 1422

In addition to this son's bath, this son laid the front number plate of the patrol car parked on the front of the restaurant, which was parked on the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to related images, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of damage);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime even though the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation has served three times as the same crime, the criminal defendant's crime of this case is not light.

However, the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the extent of impairing the utility of public goods is relatively minor, and the sentencing conditions, such as the age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, are all kinds of conditions.