logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고단4578
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2020, around 22:55, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and damaged goods for public use on the road located in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, on September 18, 2020, when receiving a report from the Defendant on the 112th day of the 'C' branch of the Dong-gu, Ulsan-do, U.S., Police Station D branch of the Ulsan-gu, U.S., and requesting the Defendant to return home after being called back to the Defendant on September 18, 2020 that the Defendant would pay for the time-off expenses to the customers under the influence of alcohol, and getting on the front day of the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Police Station D branch of the Dong-gu, U.S., Police Station called out, and let off the f patrol's head glass window attached to the above glass window, thereby destroying the vehicles attached to the said glass window.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the 112 reporting processing duties, and damaged the objects used by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

2. At around 23:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for committing a crime set forth in paragraph (1) around 23:10 on the same day; and (b) fluened the handets filled up in the D District of the Ulsan-dong Police Station of Ulsan-dong Police Station, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, where he was seated in the atmosphere of the said earth; and (c) assaulted the police officer of the said earth to walk up the I’s buckbuckbbucks to take the wall again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement I, the details of the police's statement in G, I damaged photographs, and photographs damaged for public use;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. For each of the crimes of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the defendant was called to the defendant upon receiving a report to the customer under the influence of alcohol, and thus the defendant is the defendant.

arrow